Who is popular today?

Rebekah Vardy and Coleen Rooney have arrived at the High Court in London for their high-profile libel battle.
Mrs Rooney accused Mrs Vardy of leaking “false stories” about her private life to the media in October 2019, after she said she carried out a months-long “sting operation”.
The wife of former England star Wayne Rooney was dubbed “Wagatha Christie” after publicly claiming her fellow footballer’s wife shared three fake stories, which she posted on her personal Instagram account, with The Sun newspaper.
They included Mrs Rooney (36) travelling to Mexico for a “gender selection” procedure, her planning to return to TV, and the basement flooding at her home.
Rebekah Vardy “had no choice” but to bring the libel claim against Coleen Rooney to “establish her innocence and vindicate her reputation”, the High Court has been told.
In written submissions, her barrister Hugh Tomlinson QC also said: “The allegation in the post was and remains false: Mrs Vardy had not leaked information about Mrs Rooney or her friends and family to the Sun newspaper from her private Instagram account.
“Mrs Rooney did not have the ‘irrefutable’ evidence that she claimed to have had: her so-called ‘careful investigation’ was nothing of the sort. “If anyone had been leaking information from Mrs Rooney’s private Instagram this was not done with Mrs Vardy’s knowledge or approval.”
He continued: “Mrs Vardy made strenuous but unsuccessful attempts to settle the case but the post was not taken down.”
‘Fake stories’
Rebekah Vardy knew Coleen Rooney was “posting fake stories” to see if they would be leaked to the media, her barrister said.
He said that the “candid” WhatsApp messages previously heard in court between Mrs Vardy and her agent Caroline Watt show that while “from time to time they did discuss ‘leaking’ information to the press” only one post is mentioned, in circumstances where journalists already knew the information.
Mr Tomlinson continued: “Furthermore, it is plain from the WhatsApp exchanges that Mrs Vardy was aware that Mrs Rooney was posting fake stories in order to see whether anyone would leak them, as well as the fact that she had previously been a suspect.
“She, like Mrs Rooney, believed that someone was leaking information from Mrs Rooney’s private Instagram but didn’t know who it was and thought it must be her PR as she couldn’t see why anyone would be ‘arsed with selling stories on her’”.
In a now infamous post on Twitter and Instagram, Mrs Rooney wrote: “I have saved and screenshotted all the original stories which clearly show just one person has viewed them.
“It’s .......... Rebekah Vardy’s account.”
Mrs Vardy (40) who is married to Leicester City striker Jamie Vardy, denies the accusations and is suing Mrs Rooney for libel.
Under English defamation law, Mrs Rooney must prove her post was “substantially true”.
Trial
The full trial follows months of preliminary hearings – none of which have been attended by either Mrs Vardy or Mrs Rooney.
Mrs Rooney arrived on Tuesday morning with her husband, also 36, who had a trophy-laden career with Manchester United and is now manager of Derby County.
Wearing a black suit and with her foot in a brace, she entered the Royal Courts of Justice on the Strand by the front entrance, flanked by a crowd of photographers.
Mrs Vardy arrived moments after Mrs Rooney entered the building, wearing sunglasses and a long blue-buttoned dress.
Both women sat at the front of court at the start of the hearing.
They are both expected to give evidence in the seven-day trial, as is Mr Rooney.
The case had its first court hearing in November 2020, with a judge finding that Mrs Rooney’s post “clearly identified” Mrs Vardy as being “guilty of the serious and consistent breach of trust”.
The trial before Mrs Justice Steyn continues, with a decision expected in writing at a later date.