Is housing design and planning safe in the Tories’ hands?
over 5 years in The guardian
Inspired by the late philosopher Roger Scruton, the government talks about beauty, but promotes ugly development. If they’re serious about good design, they need a theory that’s not skin-deep
The Conservative government likes beauty. It has said as much, through the mouths of ministers, so it must be true. “This government,” the housing secretary, Robert Jenrick, recently told the Daily Telegraph, “will make sure that beautiful, well-designed homes and places are the expectation, not the exception.” It has created the Building Better, Building Beautiful commission in order to help “increase the use of high-quality design for new build homes and neighbourhoods”. Last week it produced a report, Living in Beauty, that argues that beauty should be legally enshrined in the planning system.
But what’s this? Barely two weeks ago the same Robert Jenrick gave planning permission to a £1bn development called Westferry Printworks in London Docklands, against the strong objections of his own planning inspector. The latter, David Prentis, said the project’s five towers, the tallest of them 44 storeys high, would “fail to preserve” the setting of Tower Bridge and of the Unesco world heritage site in Greenwich. The development would be “harmful to the character and appearance of the area”. Its inclusion of 282 affordable homes in a total of 1,524 units was deemed not to achieve the “maximum reasonable amount”. Continue reading...